Responsive Feeding and Satter's Feeding Dynamic Models
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Responsive feeding and the division of responsibility.
We read with interest the Symposium articles on Responsive Feeding (1–5) and applaud The Journal of Nutrition for this Symposium as it rightly places focus on the importance of the feeding relationship to early childhood physical and mental well being. We wish to comment on two of the articles: the article by Engle and Pelto, " Responsive Feeding: Implications for Policy and Program Implementat...
متن کاملResponsive complementary feeding in rural Bangladesh.
It is now widely recognized that malnutrition can partly be attributed to caregiver-child interaction during feeding episodes. Current conceptual frameworks emphasize the importance of responsiveness (including active and social behaviour), psychomotor abilities of the child to self-feed, and a non-distracting feeding environment. The present observational study had three main objectives: (1) t...
متن کاملAdjusting the Eneli et al. Feeding Dynamic Intervention to make it consistent with Satter feeding and eating models.
I readwith interest the article by Eneli et al., rationale and design of the Feeding Dynamic Intervention (FDI) study for self-regulation of energy intake in preschoolers [1]. The FDI is based on the authors' interpretation of the Satter Feeding Dynamics Model (fdSatter) [2] and the Satter Division of Responsibility in Feeding (sDOR) [3]. I recognize and appreciate the authors' stated purpose o...
متن کاملResponsive feeding: implications for policy and program implementation.
In this article, we examine responsive feeding as a nutrition intervention, with an emphasis on the development and incorporation of responsive feeding into policies and programs over the last 2 decades and recommendations for increasing the effectiveness of responsive feeding interventions. A review of policy documents from international agencies and high-income countries reveals that responsi...
متن کاملSham Feeding? Same Feeding?
accepted, more obvious evidence is needed. In PPI, return of colonic motility is a hindmost concern; it takes 48 to 72 hours. Sham feeding enhances gastric emptying and increases rectosigmoid pressure activity. However, the influence of gum chewing on colonic motility is not clear. Alvimopan, a peripherally-acting μ-opioid receptor antagonist, was recently approved for the reduction of PPI afte...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of Nutrition
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0022-3166,1541-6100
DOI: 10.3945/jn.111.149542